Showing posts with label schools. Show all posts
Showing posts with label schools. Show all posts

Monday, August 30, 2010

The Dropout Economy

The following article was published in TIME Magazine on March 11, 2010 and you simply must read it.  I attached it here in it's entirety.  ***PLEASE read***  Every 10 years TIME magazine writes a piece on what it sees as "The most important trends of the new decade."   Us homeschooling, unplugged, living-off-the grid, unschooling "weirdos" wanna read this, trust me :) 
The Dropout Economy by Reihan Salam

Middle-class kids are taught from an early age that they should work hard and finish school. Yet 3 out of 10 students dropped out of high school as recently as 2006, and less than a third of young people have finished college. Many economists attribute the sluggish wage growth in the U.S. to educational stagnation, which is one reason politicians of every stripe call for doubling or tripling the number of college graduates.

But what if the millions of so-called dropouts are onto something? As conventional high schools and colleges prepare the next generation for jobs that won't exist, we're on the cusp of a dropout revolution, one that will spark an era of experimentation in new ways to learn and new ways to live.

It's important to keep in mind that behavior that seems irrational from a middle-class perspective is perfectly rational in the face of straitened circumstances. People who feel obsolete in today's information economy will be joined by millions more in the emerging post-information economy, in which routine professional work and even some high-end services will be more cheaply performed overseas or by machines. This doesn't mean that work will vanish. It does mean, however, that it will take a new and unfamiliar form.

Look at the projections of fiscal doom emanating from the federal government, and consider the possibility that things could prove both worse and better. Worse because the jobless recovery we all expect could be severe enough to starve the New Deal social programs on which we base our life plans. Better because the millennial generation could prove to be more resilient and creative than its predecessors, abandoning old, familiar and broken institutions in favor of new, strange and flourishing ones.

Imagine a future in which millions of families live off the grid, powering their homes and vehicles with dirt-cheap portable fuel cells. As industrial agriculture sputters under the strain of the spiraling costs of water, gasoline and fertilizer, networks of farmers using sophisticated techniques that combine cutting-edge green technologies with ancient Mayan know-how build an alternative food-distribution system. Faced with the burden of financing the decades-long retirement of aging boomers, many of the young embrace a new underground economy, a largely untaxed archipelago of communes, co-ops, and kibbutzim that passively resist the power of the granny state while building their own little utopias.

Rather than warehouse their children in factory schools invented to instill obedience in the future mill workers of America, bourgeois rebels will educate their kids in virtual schools tailored to different learning styles. Whereas only 1.5 million children were homeschooled in 2007, we can expect the number to explode in future years as distance education blows past the traditional variety in cost and quality. The cultural battle lines of our time, with red America pitted against blue, will be scrambled as Buddhist vegan militia members and evangelical anarchist squatters trade tips on how to build self-sufficient vertical farms from scrap-heap materials. To avoid the tax man, dozens if not hundreds of strongly encrypted digital currencies and barter schemes will crop up, leaving an underresourced IRS to play whack-a-mole with savvy libertarian "hacktivists."

Work and life will be remixed, as old-style jobs, with long commutes and long hours spent staring at blinking computer screens, vanish thanks to ever increasing productivity levels. New jobs that we can scarcely imagine will take their place, only they'll tend to be home-based, thus restoring life to bedroom suburbs that today are ghost towns from 9 to 5. Private homes will increasingly give way to cohousing communities, in which singles and nuclear families will build makeshift kinship networks in shared kitchens and common areas and on neighborhood-watch duty. Gated communities will grow larger and more elaborate, effectively seceding from their municipalities and pursuing their own visions of the good life. Whether this future sounds like a nightmare or a dream come true, it's coming.
This transformation will be not so much political as antipolitical. The decision to turn away from broken and brittle institutions, like conventional schools and conventional jobs, will represent a turn toward what military theorist John Robb calls "resilient communities," which aspire to self-sufficiency and independence. The left will return to its roots as the champion of mutual aid, cooperative living and what you might call "broadband socialism," in which local governments take on the task of building high-tech infrastructure owned by the entire community. Assuming today's libertarian revival endures, it's easy to imagine the right defending the prerogatives of state and local governments and also of private citizens — including the weird ones. This new individualism on the left and the right will begin in the spirit of cynicism and distrust that we see now, the sense that we as a society are incapable of solving pressing problems. It will evolve into a new confidence that citizens working in common can change their lives and in doing so can change the world around them.

We see this individualism in the rise of "freeganism" and in the small but growing handful of "cage-free families" who've abandoned their suburban idylls for life on the open road. We also see it in the rising number of high school seniors who take a gap year before college. While the higher-education industry continues to agitate for college for all, many young adults are stubbornly resistant, perhaps because they recognize that for a lot of them, college is an overpriced status marker and little else. In the wake of the downturn, household formation has slowed down. More than one-third of workers under 35 live with their parents.

The hope is that these young people will eventually leave the house when the economy perks up, and doubtless many will. Others, however, will choose to root themselves in their neighborhoods and use social media to create relationships that sustain them as they craft alternatives to the rat race. Somewhere in the suburbs there is an unemployed 23-year-old who is plotting a cultural insurrection, one that will resonate with existing demographic, cultural and economic trends so powerfully that it will knock American society off its axis.

Salam is a policy adviser at the nonpartisan think tank e21, a blogger for the National Review and a columnist for Forbes.com




Saturday, August 28, 2010

BFF's not allowed


So here's one!!  just when you think the school system and child "experts"  can't possibly sink any lower, they can't possible destroy our children any more than they already do on a continuous basis... it is simply not possible!! right?  Well, they have proven yet once again just how paramount, how critical, independent education is today, and just how URGENT it has become for parents to pull their kids out of the school system and to do it IMMEDIATELY.

The following is an excerpt from a piece published in The New York Times on June 16th 2010.   The title of the article, The End of the Best Friend? You must be kidding. ( I urge to please read the article )


" But increasingly, some educators and other professionals who work with children are asking a question that might surprise parents: Should a child really have a best friend?   Most children naturally seek close friends... the two special pals who share secrets and exploits, who gravitated towards each other on the playground and who head out together everyday after school - signals potential problems for school officials intent on discouraging anything that hints of exclusivity, in part because of concerns of cliques and bullying.  
'I think it is the kid's preference to pair up and have that one best friend.  As adults -  teachers and counselors - we try to encourage them NOT to do that. ' said Cristine Laycob, Dir. of Counseling... 'we try to talk to kids and work with them to have big groups of friends and not be so possessive about friends.  Parents sometimes say Johnny needs a special friend, we say he doesn't need a best friend." 

and how might you ask they go about this? read on...

through the assistance of  "friendship coaches" "  if two children seem too focused on each other, the camp will make sure to put them on different teams, seat them at different ends of the dining table, or perhaps, have a counselor invite one of them to participate in an activity with another child whom they haven't gotten to know.    ' I don't think it's particularly healthy for a child to rely on one friend.' says Jay Jacob's, the camp's director.  ' If something goes wry, it can be devastating.  It also limits the child's ability to explore other options in the world.'"


If you have not read the article I urge to please stop reading right here, click on the link and read it in its' entirety.  Reading an excerpt does not really capture it...even remotely.  This "thing", this "movement" is not the idea of one Health professional, one school, or one camp.  It is a systemic and ever growing enterprise determined to beat whatever humanity and normalcy there is still left in our children today.

I have to admit this hit close to home.  I am already disturbed by all the childhood-micromanaging epidemic that has taking over this country but this... this was one that I didn't see coming.   I was disturbed... truly disturbed and angry after reading this.  This is no more than a sophisticated form of child abuse. There is so much wrong here I don't even know where to begin.  Since when is something as special and natural as forming that best-friendship bond, the cause for bullying?  If these people really had a functioning brain cell they would know that 'bullying' in children's behavior is the direct result of parental failure.  Yes, you heard that correctly.  A child who is a bully has more than likely witnessed that type of behavior at home.  The habitual abuse from one older and larger individual over the younger and or smaller ones.  A bully thinks it is perfectly acceptable to treat others in a cruel and hurtful way, and you know why?  you'd be shocked to learn it is not because they have a best friend... they think it is okay because they have grown up in an environment that makes it permissible.   Perhaps beyond permissible, in some instances it is a matter of survival.

And what exactly is a 'bully'? and who makes that determination?  Are we talking about the kid who picks on all the little ones during lunch because he gets no attention at home and no one has bothered to be a positive example of kind behavior?  or perhaps because he himself is bullied at home and so he wants to feel superior somewhere and picks the playground as his stage?.  Or are we talking about the teen girls who snicker and make fun of the other girl who is not as popular or as pretty as they are and they do so because they wanna fit in with the crowd? and they don't want to risk not being 'cool' in front of their 'peers'.  What and who exactly are we talking about here? There is nothing I love more than the one-sweeping-cure-to-all-society's ills approach that the school system, health professionals and children experts love to engage in.  These institutions have the market cornered on group-think and let's keep everyone on the same average level so no one feels left out and THEY now feel that a simple, special, natural and old as the concept of family, part of human relationship building is TOO exclusionary???!!! are you serious?!!! what's next? The bond between parents and their child is too exclusionary because the children from a one single parent home feel left out?? and that has the potential to lead to what?? hurt feelings?

Let me say this, and here is a little something a lot of parents might not want to hear so if you have sensitive ears I suggest you take some deep breathes, if one of my children allow some jackass to make them doubt their worth and beauty as exceptional human beings, to the point where they will harm themselves as a result, that is MY failure as a parent.   Yes, MY failure.  Not the result of any clique or bff's.  My children will experience pain, that is part of life.  They will experience heart break, betrayal, disappointment, my job is to teach them through my words, but most importantly through my example, how to best handle such things.  They are experiences that help us grow, they are not experiences that we have to fear and avoid.

Is this seriously the cure? to restructure the entire human experience? I mean, what... just what type of culture are we becoming that we now have a school system where teacher's duties now include bff splitting?

I love how that one Doctor expressed, "I THINK it is the child's preference to pair up have that one best friend" Really?? You think? wow.  I also love how she goes on to say, " PARENTS sometimes say Johnny needs a best friend, but WE tell them he doesn't." It was at this point where I really wanted to punch my computer screen.  She, THEY know more than the parent.  Classic.

All  I kept thinking as I read the article were three simple words, "How dare you?,  how dare you?!" How dare you treat children like some puppets in your little science project for the perfect society? These are human beings with their own personalities... filled with thoughts, emotions, uniqueness and identities... and you feel you have the right to superficially orchestrate bonds that are natural and essential for emotional growth and development?

But you know what, every time a parent drops off a kid at a public school or some new indoctrinating camp from the glue factory, they have completely given up any rights to that child whatsoever.  Don't believe me? Did you read the article?  Do you need more evidence?   Public Schools are not even pretending anymore to be simply a place for which to implement compulsory education.  No, they are a test tube for the next generation of ill-informed, drugged, overly medicated, morbidly obese consumer; devoid of any independent thought, creativity, courage and individuality.

Am I making too much of this? I don't think so.  That's the problem in this country. If you ask me, parents in this country don't raise enough hell.   Does this affect my family directly? of course not.  My family and I unplugged from the matrix a long time ago.  But I am sick and tired of the what is being inflicted upon children this country.  And in my not so humble opinion, child abuse comes in many forms... even in very sophisticated ones.

So I shall end my rant by saying please, please... this insanity has to stop.  If you love your kids my god, get them out of these buildings RIGHT NOW.

btw, my bff inspired me to write this ;) oh how did I ever live with a bff? I don't know how I ever got through those very difficult times of having someone close to me that understood me and helped me when I needed it the most... to feel safe and like someone 'got me' when I felt like I wasn't part of the crowd.   I dedicate this post to my bff now in my adulthood and my bff in my childhood :)   Thank god!!!! for bffs ♥